Knowledge and management of traumatic dental injuries among schoolteachers in Hungary: a cross-sectional study with educational intervention.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of Hungarian schoolteachers in the management of dental trauma injuries (TDI) of children between the ages of 3 and 18 and to illustrate a brief educational intervention on TDI management. METHODS: A 15-item questionnaire on dental injuries was distributed in our observational cross-sectional study to 2720 Hungarian educational institutions to explore and evaluate teachers' knowledge in January 2019. Two years later, targeted information material was made accessible regarding TDI management. In the second post-intervention phase of the study, educator knowledge was re-evaluated using the same questionnaire. Statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests) was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 28. RESULTS: A total of 1426 answers were collected in the initial survey. Although more than half (51.9%) of the respondents previously witnessed TDIs, 86.5% still did not perceive themselves as adequately informed regarding TDI management. Most teachers submitted appropriate responses to the indicator questions relating to the urgency of referral to dental professionals (71.8%), immediate contact with parents (79.0%) or dentists (13.0%), and the solution for avulsed teeth (81.3%). However, only every second (56.2%) educator responded correctly regarding the proper cleaning method. Following accessibility to our educational material, 622 respondents completed the post-intervention questionnaire in the second phase of the study. The percentage of appropriate responses to the five indicator questions significantly increased by 5-20.6%. CONCLUSION: Teachers' knowledge of TDI was inadequate yet can improve with online education. Efforts among dental professionals, the media, and targeted interventions will ensure adequate knowledge while also improving children's dental health.

Non-pain-related complaints of paediatric patients after dental treatment under general anaesthesia.

AIM: To investigate the prevalence, duration, and severity of non-pain-related complaints after dental treatment under general anaesthesia (DTGA) and to identify correlating factors from patient's characteristics and treatment. METHODS: Parents/caregivers of children treated under general anaesthesia were asked to fill in a dichotomous questionnaire during hospitalisation and the postoperative week. Several complaints were evaluated in relation to factors associated with dental treatment and general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Postoperative morbidity after DTGA is common. Patients and their parents should be informed about the possibility of experiencing mild to moderate complaints, and adverse events that may last up to 7 days.

Pain-related complaints of paediatric patients after dental treatment under general anaesthesia.

AIM: To identify factors related to postoperative pain and to recognise strategies to reduce this pain after dental treatment under general anaesthesia. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study. Children treated under general ansesthesia reported pain daily using the Wong Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale. Their parents/caregivers filled in a related Yes/No questionnaire during hospitalisation and the first postoperative week. The duration and severity of pain were evaluated in relation to various factors. CONCLUSION: A well-established protocol is indicated to reduce operation time. Patients and their parents should be informed about the possibility of constantly subsiding postoperative pain that may last for a week. As additional local anaesthesia during general anaesthesia (GA) does not provide postoperative pain reduction in deciduous tooth extraction cases, its administration could be omitted.

Follow up of thyroid hormone parameters in chronically ill geriatric patients: screening for thyroid disorders at hospital admission justified.

UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to investigate if screening of chronically ill geriatric patients for thyroid dysfunction is justified just upon hospital admission. TSH was measured in 124 patients at hospital admission and 11-86 (Median 37) days afterwards. FT4 was measured in cases with subnormal, suppressed or elevated TSH (43 cases). Out of 81 patients with normal (0.5-3.6 mU/l) TSH, the control value was subnormal (0.1-<0.5 mU/l) in 6 and elevated (>3.6 mU/l) in one case, but in none of the patients became suppressed (<0.1 mU/l). In 13/30 patients with subnormal TSH the control value was normal but in none of the patients suppressed or elevated. On the contrary, all cases with suppressed (N=9) or elevated (N=4) TSH remained in the same ranges at follow up. Low (<13 pmol/l, N=3) or elevated (>27 pmol/l, N=5) initial FT4 levels did not change in the follow up as well. Out of 35 patients with normal FT4, one became low and another elevated. Improvement or worsening of the clinical state in the follow up did not correlate to changes of TSH. The prevalence of unsuspected thyroid dysfunctions were 11.3% (hyperthyroidism clinical: 4, subclinical: 5, hypothyroidism clinical: 3, subclinical: 2 cases). All cases except one with subclinical hypothyroidism were detected by the initial screening. Only one patient with clinical hyperthyroidism was initial misinterpreted as having subclinical disease. CONCLUSIONS: In chronically ill geriatric patients investigated at hospital admission, a measurable TSH practically excludes hyperthyroidism in the follow up. Suppressed TSH levels remain suppressed but subnormal levels should be controlled because their normalization frequently occur in the follow up. Screening upon hospital admission is sensitive enough to detect cases of thyroid dysfunction and justified by their high prevalence.

The blood spot thyrotropin method is not adequate to screen for hypothyroidism in the elderly living in abundant-iodine intake areas: comparison to sensitive thyrotropin measurements.

We investigated whether the blood spot thyrotropin (TSH) method was adequate for screening elderly subjects with abundant iodine intake (median excretion 330 microg/g creatinine) for hypothyroidism. In 97 healthy adults (group A), 210 nursing home residents (group B) and 265 elderly subjects living at home (group C) serum (sensitivity < 0.02 mU/L, cost 1.2 U.S. dollars [USD]) and blood spot TSH (sensitivity < 1.0 mU/L, cost 0.4 USD) were measured, and the sensitivity and specificity of different blood spot TSH cutoff points to detect cases with elevated serum TSH were calculated. Elevated (> 3.5 mU/L) serum TSH levels (group A, 6.2%; group B, 16.2%; group C, 22.3%; B > A, p = 0.025; C > A, p < 0.001) were detected with the required sensitivity of greater than 0.9 only if the cutoff point of the blood spot TSH was set as low as 2.5 mU/L, but this led to a considerable loss of specificity. At cutoff point 2.5 mU/L, the rate of positivity was 39.3% and the cost of blood spot screening/person increased to 0.88 USD, considering that positive cases have to be rechecked by serum TSH to exclude false positivity. Cases with significantly elevated (> 10.0 mU/L) serum TSH (group A, 1.03%; group B, 2.85%; group C, 2.20%) were detected at blood spot cutoff points 10.0-4.0 mU/L with a sensitivity of 1.0 and without considerable loss of specificity. We conclude that while screening for hypothyroidism in the elderly population with abundant iodine intake is justified by the high prevalence of elevated ultrasensitive serum TSH values, the sensitivity of the blood spot method is insufficient to detect the subclinical hypothyroidism accurately and would, therefore, fail to detect most affected subjects.